Spread Footings and Mats.
Figure 1.1 Square or continuous footing with axial loading.
The distribution of the soil resistance shown in Figure 1.1 is usually assumed, allowing the computation of the shear and bending moment at Section a-a for design of the reinforcing steel. If the concept of soil–structure interaction is employed, the downward movement of the footing at Section a-a would be slightly more that the downward movement at Section b-b. If the engineer is able to compute a new distribution of soil resistance for the deformed footing, a more appropriate value for soil resistance could be computed.
However, the savings due to the lesser amount of reinforcing steel needed would be far less than the cost of engineering required for such analyses. For some soils, the soil resistance would be higher at Section b-b than at Section a-a even taking the deformation of the footing into account. Unless the dimensions of the footing are very large, the engineer could assume a distribution of soil resistance to give the largest bending moment at Section a-a without substantial cost for reinforcing. The concept of soil–structure interaction is discussed in the last five chapters of this book and illustrated by application to problems where the movement of the soil under load must be considered in detail in solving a practical problem.
Rather than being square, the footing in Figure 1.1 could be continuous to support the load for a wall or from a series of columns. With a series of concentrated loads, the soil reaction would more complex than for a single column, but uniform distribution, as shown in Figure 1.1, is normally
assumed.
Nominal stress distribution for the case of a square or continuous footing subjected to generalized loading is shown in Figure 1.2. Statics equations may be used to compute the distribution of vertical stresses at the base of thefooting to resist the vertical load and moment. The stresses to resist the shear force may either be normal resistance at the edge of the footing or unit shear at the base of the footing. The engineer may decide to eliminate the normal resistance at the edge of the footing because of possible shrinkage or shallow penetration, allowing a straightforward computation of the shearing resistance at the base of the foundation.
A much larger shallow foundation such as a mat, and similar foundations are used widely. A stress bulb is a device sometimes used to illustrate the difference in behavior of foundations of different sizes. For equal unit loadings on a footing or mat, the stress bulb extends below the foundation to a distance about equal to the width of the foundation. Assuming the same kind of soil and a load less than the failure load, the short-term settlement of the mat would be much greater than the short-term settlement of the footing (settlement of footings and mats is discussed in Chapter 7). Thus, in the design of a mat foundation, the short-term settlement must be given appropriate consideration. Also, the structural design of the mat would plainly
require more thought than that of the footing.
With regard to the design of mat foundations for residences on expansive clay, many designers use the BRAB slab recommended by the Building Re- search Advisory Board (1968). The mat includes a series of reinforced beams on the edges and interior of the mat, with dimensions depending on the nature of the expansive clay. The concept is that the mat would have adequate bending stiffness to maintain a level surface even though, with time, differential movement of the clay occurs.
A view of a shallow foundation under construction is shown in Figure 1.3.
The plastic sheets serve to keep the soil intact during the placement of concrete and prevent moisture from moving through the slab by capillarity. Communication cables may be placed in the slab. The deepened sections contain extra steel and serve as beams to strengthen the slab. The engineer has the responsibility to prepare specifications for construction and should be asked to inspect the construction.
Figure 1.2 Square or continuous footing with generalized loading.
Figure 1.3 Shallow foundations under construction.
0 comments:
Post a Comment